meridiani.planum
05-15 06:42 PM
(one last bump up...)
Odd that folks from 2004 are still waiting, they have been current for a while, maybe file a Writ of Mandamus and get this through?
Odd that folks from 2004 are still waiting, they have been current for a while, maybe file a Writ of Mandamus and get this through?
wallpaper AKA: Methadone Hydrochloride
aksaharan
09-24 04:14 PM
Just trying to understand what would that statement indicate for next/future visa bulletins. It can be deciphered in different dimensions ie:
- all visas have been allocated and all upto priority date have been allocated (second one may not be true) .. this leads to no retrogression (or) no movement in next bulltin
- all visas allocated and not all people allocated .. which may lead to retrogression in next bulletin
There are many other combination of interpretations as well.
- all visas have been allocated and all upto priority date have been allocated (second one may not be true) .. this leads to no retrogression (or) no movement in next bulltin
- all visas allocated and not all people allocated .. which may lead to retrogression in next bulletin
There are many other combination of interpretations as well.
uma001
11-20 07:06 PM
OP sounds unrealistic
2011 now hooked on methadone.
sw33t
07-30 12:07 PM
23 members and counting.
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
more...
dilbert_cal
03-09 05:51 PM
Answer Embedded
Need your help..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
YES
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
YES, you would need a copy of the I-140 and since you have good relations, it should not be an issue
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
This is a grey area. Not sure but I believe post-April, approved LC would have a validity of 45 days or so - so it may not be reusable. From your point of view, I'm not sure if the LC does get reused, does it impact your PD or not - my take is it doesnt but I'm not a lawyer.
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
Need your help..
Post MBA (since Jun'06), I am working with a new employer. My previous employer (bachelor degree), filed for my labor in Nov'04 and I left this company in Jun'06; howevr employer didn't withdrew my labor application. My labor with previous employer was approved in Feb'07. I have good relation with my previous employer and they are ready to file my I-140; I have few questions regarding this:
Can my previous employer file I-140, even if I am not working with them?
YES
If I-140 is approved, would I able to transfer the PD to my new employer, when he initiates my labor application.
YES, you would need a copy of the I-140 and since you have good relations, it should not be an issue
Once I transfer my PD, can my previous employer use this approved LC for other candidate?
This is a grey area. Not sure but I believe post-April, approved LC would have a validity of 45 days or so - so it may not be reusable. From your point of view, I'm not sure if the LC does get reused, does it impact your PD or not - my take is it doesnt but I'm not a lawyer.
Based on my new qualifications (MBA), my job description has changed totally compared to my previous job.
Thanks in advance..
smuggymba
05-12 04:01 PM
Hello,
Is it possible to file I-140 without joining the employer? Can one join the employer after the PERM and I-140 are approved? Any risks in this case?
Thanks
u can file but u have to join the petition filing employer once u get GC or otherwise it will be fraud.
Is it possible to file I-140 without joining the employer? Can one join the employer after the PERM and I-140 are approved? Any risks in this case?
Thanks
u can file but u have to join the petition filing employer once u get GC or otherwise it will be fraud.
more...
buehler
05-14 06:24 PM
agiridhar,
I was sarcastic, if you didn't get it. INS/government always had monopoly over giving out of GCs(the constitution guarantees it for them). They never had competition about it. You're kidding yourself to think that you can sue them on anti-trust laws. Some other laws may be but definitely not anti-trust laws.
I was sarcastic, if you didn't get it. INS/government always had monopoly over giving out of GCs(the constitution guarantees it for them). They never had competition about it. You're kidding yourself to think that you can sue them on anti-trust laws. Some other laws may be but definitely not anti-trust laws.
2010 Methadone Side Effects
atumalla
11-06 12:46 PM
I got two luds on 140 485 131 765 after FP.
more...
cheers2all
05-22 01:49 PM
Hi Smrryl,
Was your stamping successful at Matamoros?
Thanks,
Cheers2All
Was your stamping successful at Matamoros?
Thanks,
Cheers2All
hair 2010 methadone side effects
godbless
11-27 03:52 PM
The interview process is independent of the way you made your appointment. Its just that you being a returning US worker need an early appointment at the US Consulate. Well, the appointment dates these days are already very easily available without any long waitings like before. Infact being a returning US worker, you should expect less number of questions from the counselor.
more...
sanju
02-07 03:18 PM
I have valid H1B visa in my passport.
Can I travel to India via London.
Can you please tell me what restrictions we have at london to travel. I heard some European countries have restrictions to travel.
-------------------------
For transit flight through London (i.e. UK)
-------------------------
If a valid US visa is stamped in your passport and the passport and visa have not expired on the day of your travel, you are exempt from the transit visa requirement at London. If the visa is not stamped in you passport, say you are carrying advance parole travel document, in that case you need a Transit visa.
-------------------------
For transit flight through Paris (i.e. France)
-------------------------
If a valid US visa is stamped in your passport and the passport and visa have not expired on the day of your travel, you are exempt from the transit visa requirement at Paris. If you are carrying advance parole travel document, in that case too you do not need a Transit visa at Paris.
Hope this is useful.
Can I travel to India via London.
Can you please tell me what restrictions we have at london to travel. I heard some European countries have restrictions to travel.
-------------------------
For transit flight through London (i.e. UK)
-------------------------
If a valid US visa is stamped in your passport and the passport and visa have not expired on the day of your travel, you are exempt from the transit visa requirement at London. If the visa is not stamped in you passport, say you are carrying advance parole travel document, in that case you need a Transit visa.
-------------------------
For transit flight through Paris (i.e. France)
-------------------------
If a valid US visa is stamped in your passport and the passport and visa have not expired on the day of your travel, you are exempt from the transit visa requirement at Paris. If you are carrying advance parole travel document, in that case too you do not need a Transit visa at Paris.
Hope this is useful.
hot lotion side effects.
Blog Feeds
05-27 12:40 PM
Two little-known types of immigrant visas are the T and the U visas. The T visa is for people innocently involved in human trafficking, and the U visa is for victims of crime. The U visa's basic purpose is to make it easier for police to prosecute those who commit violence.
Both types of visas were discussed in a recent Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/052010dnmetuvisa.8c47617.html) article. Here are excerpts from the article, beginning with a discussion of the U visa:
The visas began flowing only 18 months ago and the majority have gone to domestic violence victims, say officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, up to 10,000 such visas are authorized annually. Illegal immigrants may receive such visas if they've suffered "substantial" physical or mental abuse from criminal activity and, among other things, a law enforcement agency certifies they have information on criminal activity. The visa can lead to permanent legal residency status.
The issuing of U visas comes at a tense time in the national immigration debate, amid a polarizing crackdown and potentially broader policing powers against immigrants in Arizona. And it illuminates a prickly point of justice: Should the federal government give illegal immigrants special treatment for a societal good such as fighting violent crime?
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act created both the U visa and the T visa. They're near the end of a complex network of visas, A through V.
T visas, for those involved in human trafficking, began flowing in 2002, but the flow of U visas was delayed as regulations on issuance were hammered out. In the last three full fiscal years, only about 250 to 300 T visas have been approved of the maximum annual allotment of 5,000.
In the last fiscal year, ending in September 2009, the federal government authorized 5,825 U visas. In the first five months of this fiscal year, nearly 5,000 such visas were given. There are about 6,600 visa applications pending, and the 10,000 allotment is expected to be reached as early as next month, said Maria Elena Garcia Upson, a spokeswoman for the immigration agency.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/9QAoUnEU-G4/)
Both types of visas were discussed in a recent Dallas Morning News (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/052010dnmetuvisa.8c47617.html) article. Here are excerpts from the article, beginning with a discussion of the U visa:
The visas began flowing only 18 months ago and the majority have gone to domestic violence victims, say officials from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, up to 10,000 such visas are authorized annually. Illegal immigrants may receive such visas if they've suffered "substantial" physical or mental abuse from criminal activity and, among other things, a law enforcement agency certifies they have information on criminal activity. The visa can lead to permanent legal residency status.
The issuing of U visas comes at a tense time in the national immigration debate, amid a polarizing crackdown and potentially broader policing powers against immigrants in Arizona. And it illuminates a prickly point of justice: Should the federal government give illegal immigrants special treatment for a societal good such as fighting violent crime?
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act created both the U visa and the T visa. They're near the end of a complex network of visas, A through V.
T visas, for those involved in human trafficking, began flowing in 2002, but the flow of U visas was delayed as regulations on issuance were hammered out. In the last three full fiscal years, only about 250 to 300 T visas have been approved of the maximum annual allotment of 5,000.
In the last fiscal year, ending in September 2009, the federal government authorized 5,825 U visas. In the first five months of this fiscal year, nearly 5,000 such visas were given. There are about 6,600 visa applications pending, and the 10,000 allotment is expected to be reached as early as next month, said Maria Elena Garcia Upson, a spokeswoman for the immigration agency.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/9QAoUnEU-G4/)
more...
house Methadone Hydrochloride USP.
gk_2000
05-23 10:35 PM
Oh well, it means at least they read our letters
tattoo wallpaper side effects for acne you methadone side effects. side effects
acecupid
09-20 01:57 PM
I am going out of country for 8 weeks, do you think i can move to state minimum insruance during this period and save some money ?
Please provide your valuable opinion.
Thanks
You can definitely save money by doing that. I had to keep my car in storage for an extended period when I was away and I just kept the comprehensive part of the insurance coverage and removed all others including collision since I was not driving it. The cost of insurance with out the collision, etc. is very low.
Please provide your valuable opinion.
Thanks
You can definitely save money by doing that. I had to keep my car in storage for an extended period when I was away and I just kept the comprehensive part of the insurance coverage and removed all others including collision since I was not driving it. The cost of insurance with out the collision, etc. is very low.
more...
pictures Physical Effects of Methadone
vinabath
03-17 04:30 PM
1. your employer has to proffer you a position which has either BS+5 or advanced degree as minimum requirement.
2. you accept it and ask your employer to start the GC process.
3. your employer applies for Labor Certification for the proffered position.
4. your employer applies for 140 for the cleared labor. here the employer requests the USCIS to use the earlier PD of your approved EB3 140
2. you accept it and ask your employer to start the GC process.
3. your employer applies for Labor Certification for the proffered position.
4. your employer applies for 140 for the cleared labor. here the employer requests the USCIS to use the earlier PD of your approved EB3 140
dresses paxil and acne side effects
visa_reval
03-14 03:46 PM
and I dont have an answer for it. Can somebody point us to the doc pls.
more...
makeup side effects for retin a.
Prashanthi
08-21 01:39 PM
My wife is currently on H4 and she is planning to apply for Residency here in the US on an exchange visa (J1). Let us suppose that she gets her status adjusted here in the US from H4 to J1 and then travels outside the US (say India). Then, she would have to get a J1 visa stamped on her passport. Considering that her spouse (that's me) would be on H1B, it would be rather difficult for her to prove that she would return to India. Do you think there is a greater chance of denial of J1 visa to her at the US consulate? If yes, how do you recommend we go about doing it? Your answer would be appreciated.
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
The red flag is usually raised when one has immediate relatives who are Citizens or Green card holders. If you have a spouse who is on H-1 it does not mean that you intend to immigrate to the United States. However, the fact that you filed for an immigrant petition might effect her visa application adversely, the consulate is capable of rejecting for any reason and no judicial review exists if the visa is rejected. Good luck.
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
The red flag is usually raised when one has immediate relatives who are Citizens or Green card holders. If you have a spouse who is on H-1 it does not mean that you intend to immigrate to the United States. However, the fact that you filed for an immigrant petition might effect her visa application adversely, the consulate is capable of rejecting for any reason and no judicial review exists if the visa is rejected. Good luck.
girlfriend finder xanax side effects
karan36
11-08 02:59 PM
Approved Asylum in 06. Applied for GC in 07, still pending and received this letter a few days back.
Your case is on hold because you appear to be inadmissible under ?212(a)(3)(B) of the INA, and USCIS currently has no authority not to apply the inadmissibility ground(s) to which you appear to be subject. Rather than denying your application based on inadmissibility, we are holding adjudication in abeyance while the Department of Homeland Security considers additional exercises of the Secretary of Homeland Security?s discretionary exemption authority. Such an exercise of the exemption authority might allow us to approve your case."
My question is - I am married to a US Citizen, and have a child(yes I know I should have applied thru her- but did'nt) Can I apply for another GC thru wife.
Will my Work permit be renewed once it expires.
Thanks
Your case is on hold because you appear to be inadmissible under ?212(a)(3)(B) of the INA, and USCIS currently has no authority not to apply the inadmissibility ground(s) to which you appear to be subject. Rather than denying your application based on inadmissibility, we are holding adjudication in abeyance while the Department of Homeland Security considers additional exercises of the Secretary of Homeland Security?s discretionary exemption authority. Such an exercise of the exemption authority might allow us to approve your case."
My question is - I am married to a US Citizen, and have a child(yes I know I should have applied thru her- but did'nt) Can I apply for another GC thru wife.
Will my Work permit be renewed once it expires.
Thanks
hairstyles of methadone side effects.
ckpas
10-03 12:17 PM
thanks a lot for your reply.
My employer looked at DOL website and found the status is in-process.
Another question : when you say back to normal process, what do you mean ?
I found that the "Govt error appeal cases" are processed as current, standard appeal have a backlog of aug 2007. My employer said mine wouldn't fall under any of these two conditions. He is confident that the CO just will certify anytime soon. Is this the case ?
My employer looked at DOL website and found the status is in-process.
Another question : when you say back to normal process, what do you mean ?
I found that the "Govt error appeal cases" are processed as current, standard appeal have a backlog of aug 2007. My employer said mine wouldn't fall under any of these two conditions. He is confident that the CO just will certify anytime soon. Is this the case ?
dipmay2002
10-28 05:59 PM
I recently change employer on EAD in NJ and new employer is saying that I can't claim withholding allowance for dependents on EAD; I had no issue with my previous employer and was claiming 6 withholding allowances; I told them that my previous payroll processor was ADP and none of my friends on EAD had any issues claiming dependents; They are saying that this is new 2010 rule change and you need to have GC for it. I told them that all dependents have SSN and passes 182 days resident alien test rule..they are not agreed..Is it true? Please let me/send any links/information to prove it...
va_dude
04-20 12:09 PM
check out the form at: http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-693.pdf
On page towards the bottom it prompts the doctor to enter details of the tb skin test.
Did u actually take the test? If you did, then perhaps ur doc missed it.
If i remember correctly, the doc i went to gave us two copies of the form, one that was sealed for uscis and the other for our reference. Anyway, if they dont have a copy of it, get a new one and make sure this info is filled out and any attach any additional relevant doc and send it to uscis.
If u got a lawyer, i suggest you get them to send the info with an attached letter etc.
On page towards the bottom it prompts the doctor to enter details of the tb skin test.
Did u actually take the test? If you did, then perhaps ur doc missed it.
If i remember correctly, the doc i went to gave us two copies of the form, one that was sealed for uscis and the other for our reference. Anyway, if they dont have a copy of it, get a new one and make sure this info is filled out and any attach any additional relevant doc and send it to uscis.
If u got a lawyer, i suggest you get them to send the info with an attached letter etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment